mailto: blog -at- heyrick -dot- eu
I found my other little oscilloscope. More importantly, I found the PP3-to-barrel adaptor to run the thing off a 9V battery.
With this now found, I went out and started the mower to see what sort of charging was taking place.
It was a surprise how solid and stable the output actually is. Felicity gives out around 12.6V at idle, and 14.1V when doing 50kph.
The mower? The 'scope measured 12.16V when idle, rising to 12.37V (shown) when running at full speed. You can also see it is a pretty stable output as well. I was half expecting to see peaks from rectification, but at various timebases, nothing looked like a sine wave. Or anything other than a fairly flat line.
It is, mind you, a fairly weak output. The average charging voltage of a lead acid battery is between 2.15V~2.35V per cell, which for a typical six cell battery, equates to 12.9V~14.1V. A value often noted is 13.8V, which is a typical "standard charge" value, although smart chargers will vary the output depending on current.
Cough sneeze wheeze
If I'm coughing and sneezing, I'm not dying of the plague. It's just hayfever. Here's a photo of my windscreen I took yesterday. It was clean on Friday!
One of the things that really stands out with RISC OS is how back in the dark ages it is when it comes to character input and output. For example, there is a SWI call to output a newline (the obviously named
OS_NewLine), but there isn't one to clear the screen. A number of screen manipulations, such as controlling the text and graphics cursor, clearing the screen (text form or graphics form) and setting the windows, origins, or cursor position come down to spitting out bytes directly to the VDU driver. The text window, for example, is
VDU 28,left,bottom,right,top and it's
VDU 31,x,y to set the text cursor; and since we're sending bytes it runs into problems with display modes that have more than 256 columns across the screen. It's easily done these days - FullHD (1920x1080 has 240 text columns).
Then, the joy of reading the keyboard. The OS offers
OS_ReadLine, both of which do exactly as they suggest; but it is worth noting that both will block until something is available to be returned.
There are calls to ask "is a key pressed?" and "is this key pressed?", but now we're delving around in the mad maze of
OS_Byte. Then we walk into the distinction that the call to return a keypress (within optional time limit (
OS_Byte 129)) returns the character as an ASCII code in R1, however you have to check R2 to see if a character was actually returned as R1 will be junk otherwise (instead of doing something useful like returning 0). But the code to check if a specific key is pressed? Well now we're dealing with "internal key numbers". Clearly extra codes will be required to detect pressing non-character keys like Shift and Alt, but the thing is that the internal keys bear no obvious relationship to the characters or the keyboard.
There is actually an explanation for the bizarre internal keyboard arrangement. Consider that
Tab is 96,
Z is 97,
Space is 98, and
V is 99.
How is this possible? What do those keys have in common?
That diagram is from a PDF version of the BBC AUG. I don't know where my copy is, else I'd make a more readable scan. ☺
The penultimate line of the keyboard matrix (the one with all the diodes) reads Tab, Z, Space, V, B, M, and indeed B and M are the next numbers in the sequence.
Let's try the second line down.
5 and for some bizarre reason
F4. Looking at the key table, yup. Q is 16. 3-5 are 17, 18, and 19. And F4 is indeed 20.
But, wait, we can further break this down. The keyboard matrix consists of ten columns and eight rows. If we consider the columns to be four bits and the rows to be three, we can try something. The
R key, is pretty much in the middle. It is a bridge between column 3 and row 4. In binary, %0011 for the column and %100 for the key, but this doesn't match the keypress (51, or %0110011).
If we try the next key up in the matrix, it's a
T, key code 35. In binary, that is %0100011. This doesn't make sense though, the row values are going down instead of up. To put this to the test, the key below the R is
F, which according to this logic ought to be %1000011, or 67 in decimal. Which is exactly what it is. I can only guess it is wired up back to front or something?
At any rate, the internal key numbers used by RISC OS directly relate to how the BBC Micro's keyboard matrix was arranged in hardware.
Please note that while I check this page every so often, I am not able to control what users write; therefore I disclaim all liability for unpleasant and/or infringing and/or defamatory material. Undesired content will be removed as soon as it is noticed. By leaving a comment, you agree not to post material that is illegal or in bad taste, and you should be aware that the time and your IP address are both recorded, should it be necessary to find out who you are. Oh, and don't bother trying to inline HTML. I'm not that stupid! ☺
You can now follow comment additions with the comment RSS feed. This is distinct from the b.log RSS feed, so you can subscribe to one or both as you wish.
|David Pilling, 18th April 2020, 02:34|
I am surprised if all VDU calls do not by now have SWI equivalents - unless things like text output and clearing the screen are deprecated.
Keyboard - yeah mess. Recall Acorn having their own keyboard design at the start of the Archimedes - Gr key or something on right control.
I did the UniversalKeyboard module for Hearsay and OPro, not perfect but it shows the way. Simon Vantage bloke told me the thing was to replace keyboard buffer with something 1 word (4 bytes) wide.
As ever all the apps use the old code, so it has to go on.
|J.G.Harston, 24th April 2020, 23:22|
Yes there is. SWI 256+12.
|Rick, 25th April 2020, 00:16|
Yes, OS_WriteI+char will send the character to the VDU stream, as would OS_WriteC if it was in R0...
...but however it is being done, we're still essentially spitting bytes to the VDU drivers.
There is OS_NewLine but there is no OS_ClearScreen. There is no obvious way to set VDU variables so positioning the text cursor is still VDU 31,x,y (and limited in that x and y are bytes so max out at 255).
As for the keyboard, isn't that sort of what DeepKeys does? At any rate, the keyboard handling strikes me as a rather icky mess that was cobbled together for Arthur and then just hack upon hack since then.
List all b.log entries
Return to the site index
PS: Don't try to be clever.
It's a simple substring match.
Last read at 04:02 on 2020/08/06.
© 2020 Rick Murray
This web page is licenced for your personal, private, non-commercial use only. No automated processing by advertising systems is permitted.
RIPA notice: No consent is given for interception of page transmission.