Rick's b.log - entry 2023/04/02

A longer time lapse

In this video, you can see a few interesting things:

• Wobbly start - the camera is held in place with a little loop of electrical tape. In the minutes following the camera being put in position, it 'settles'. One of these days I'll find my hot-glue gun and stick the thing in place more securely.
• Around 8 seconds - a blackbird frolicking.
• Around 13 seconds - a thunderstorm that brought with it a massive hailstorm, hailstones the size of garden peas and baked beans. You'll notice the camera abruptly shift. A bolt of lighting directly overhead caused a thunder shockwave the shook the house (and cracked one of the windows!).
• Around 28 seconds - it's the Coypu! No, not a giant rat. He/she/it ambles around munching on the grass. I'm not sure why or how it's become disassociated from the family over at the not-pond, but it seems quite happy wandering around existing all by itself. I can empathise.
• About 31 seconds - sunset.
• About 34 seconds - nightfall.

Night falls slightly sooner with the camera as its low light response . . . was probably impressive in 2005. ☺ But it's actually not that much difference in speed for us humans, just a little later as our eyes have a secret weapon (switching from cones to rods) which helps with low light vision.

Another thing that I find interesting in these time lapse recordings is how fast the shadows dance. I know, when I'm outside, that the sun moves. But it's more a sort of "it's up there (beat) it's over there". Looking at the shadows, I feel like I ought to be able to look up and literally watch the thing moving.
Don't do that, by the way. Looking at the sun is not good for the eyeballs. Blown pixels can't be replaced.

Oh, hello.

Hello, Wagtail.

We looked at each other as he kept on hopping around the windowsill. After examining it in detail, one eye on me, he decided there was nothing of interest here, turned directly to face me for a moment, then flew away.
I only got that quick photo over the back of my monitor as I didn't want to scare him away with sudden or threatening movements. Perhaps that explains the final gesture, a sort of "thanks for being cool about this"?

The end of my little holiday

Otherwise, it was a peaceful holiday. I sat out on the sunny warm days, had to go fetch a parcel because the carrier couldn't be bothered, saw the first swallow, drove the longest distance I've gone yet to get my car seen to (and know that I can do it again for the major service), and wrote firmware for a time lapse camera (as I'm sure you've noticed ☺). So it's not been a wasted week. Just... a week that passed all too quickly.

Back to the grind tomorrow. Pfffffft.

Your comments:

Please note that while I check this page every so often, I am not able to control what users write; therefore I disclaim all liability for unpleasant and/or infringing and/or defamatory material. Undesired content will be removed as soon as it is noticed. By leaving a comment, you agree not to post material that is illegal or in bad taste, and you should be aware that the time and your IP address are both recorded, should it be necessary to find out who you are. Oh, and don't bother trying to inline HTML. I'm not that stupid! ☺ ADDING COMMENTS DOES NOT WORK IF READING TRANSLATED VERSIONS.
 
You can now follow comment additions with the comment RSS feed. This is distinct from the b.log RSS feed, so you can subscribe to one or both as you wish.

Zerosquare, 3rd April 2023, 21:16

Can you set the camera's exposure and white balance manually? I believe it would eliminate (or at least reduce) the "strobe light" effect and make the timelapse look smoother.    For extra credit, implement your own auto-exposure/auto-white balancing algorithm, but with smoothing over a longer time period (say, minutes instead of seconds) :)

Rick, 3rd April 2023, 22:28

Not normally. There might be a way using the internal registers, but the only available datasheet is a preliminary one lacking details, and my SDK is too old for direct register access.    I'm not sure that it would work, either, to leave the thing on all the time and not power down between shots, as the camera usually runs fully automatic and as such can change between two shots taken at the same time if the ambient (sun goes behind a cloud, say) changes.    I think it would be nifty to do an algorithm to sort out the pictures, however that sort of maths is way above me...

David Pilling, 5th April 2023, 13:34

Brings ideas to mind, not that it would be worth doing any of them.  Could take multiple exposures at each time and select suitable brightness in post processing.  Could post process to even out brightness.  Could look at overall brightness of an image - just sum all the pixel values and then decide whether to take another one with a different exposure setting.    Can assume that any pixel of 254 or more is over exposed and any of 1 or zero is under exposed.      Existing software. As with focus stacking which glues together photos based on different bits being in focus there is software which takes photos with different exposures and makes an enhanced image. Exposure blending.  Useful applications - watching the water level in the well, or how cloudy the sky is.

Add a comment (v0.11) [help?] . . . try the comment feed!
		Your name
		Your email	(optional)
		Validation	Are you real? Please type 95281 backwards.
		Your comment